关于“排解資料彙整錯誤”的评价

RiteshKumar A. · 评论5 months之前

M Priya K. · 评论5 months之前

Subhendu sekhar D. · 评论5 months之前

Arjun M. · 评论5 months之前

Sourav S. · 评论5 months之前

Sourav S. · 评论5 months之前

Sheshmani C. · 评论5 months之前

Suraj C. · 评论5 months之前

Ezhumalai L. · 评论5 months之前

Sai Surya Teja K. · 评论5 months之前

Omkar s. · 评论5 months之前

GG

vaibhav G. · 评论5 months之前

Kamble R. · 评论5 months之前

Kajal P. · 评论5 months之前

Content and intent is good. Stuck on Task 2, Step 3 with no apparent resolution after cmd + F "data-to-insights" led me to after a long time ... to read on in the instructions even though I did not finish step 3. This led me to understand that step 4 should actually be step 3, which gives context to copying/typing something about the public datasets name. I think a better design would be to have lab steps accomplish something. If they do not, then they should be a note. I also think the sequencing of this is incorrect. I was looking to copy something in step 3 and was stuck for over 50 minutes before I was able to move past this step to find out the information I needed was after the step I was stuck on. This might be my learning style, but I don't skip around steps, and this lab was very, very frustrating because of the flow of information and instructions was not in the right order and sequence. One thing I can take away from this is that it might be helpful for me to practice reading the whole lab before doing any work. Then once I have this, I might be able to navigate through the gaps in steps and what is needing to be accomplished. Thank you for the review of data joins though, great to keep fresh on this.

Wes J. · 评论5 months之前

Novan N. · 评论5 months之前

You C. · 评论5 months之前

ok

Brad S. · 评论5 months之前

Steven H. · 评论5 months之前

Dharmesh G. · 评论5 months之前

Bastián L. · 评论5 months之前

la forma de terminar el lab es mala porque si me faltó una respuesta que no vi se borra todo

Fernando S. · 评论5 months之前

Vijay A. · 评论5 months之前

Jose M. · 评论5 months之前

Tharindu M. · 评论5 months之前