AHYBRID041 Observing Anthos Services Reviews
5456 reviews
Dharani A. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Rabee A. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Error with the loadgenerator pod init container failing. Attempt 10: Pinging frontend: frontend:80... + echo 'Attempt 10: Pinging frontend: frontend:80...' + wget --server-response http://frontend:80 + awk '/^ HTTP/{print $2}' + STATUSCODE= + '[' -eq 200 ] sh: 200: unknown operand
Joe A. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Vinayak B. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Muhammad Alwi A. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
P Anish R. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Valeriy C. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
The entire lab seems half broken. The SLO is full of permission errors, some interfaces don't have anything that matches the descriptions written, the asmcli command hanged twice, traces were not being exported, the demo app was slow at all times (not just after the canary deployment), etc. Overall, the entire thing needs to be revisited.
Angelo B. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
subhasis m. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Abhaya M. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
good one
sumit k. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Ritesh J. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Abbasali S. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Abbasali S. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Manoj J. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Ismael U. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Ismael U. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
This lab needs a fix and some basic proofreading. It is annoying that you provide such low-quality content. 1. loadgenerator doesn't start. This breaks the lab beginning with Task 6. ``` $ kubectl get deployments/loadgenerator NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE loadgenerator 0/1 1 0 15m ``` ``` $ kubectl logs deployments/loadgenerator Error from server (BadRequest): container "main" in pod "loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg" is waiting to start: PodInitializing ``` ``` $ kubectl describe pod/loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Normal Scheduled 16m default-scheduler Successfully assigned default/loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg to gke-gke-pool-12345-5d62d571-7883 Normal Pulling 16m kubelet Pulling image "gcr.io/gke-release/asm/proxyv2:1.18.7-asm.4" Normal Pulled 16m kubelet Successfully pulled image "gcr.io/gke-release/asm/proxyv2:1.18.7-asm.4" in 6.36s (6.36s including waiting) Normal Created 16m kubelet Created container istio-validation Normal Started 16m kubelet Started container istio-validation Normal Pulled 16m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 983ms (983ms including waiting) Normal Pulled 14m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 329ms (329ms including waiting) Normal Pulled 11m kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 162ms (162ms including waiting) Normal Pulling 9m25s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Pulling image "busybox:latest" Normal Pulled 9m25s kubelet Successfully pulled image "busybox:latest" in 165ms (165ms including waiting) Normal Created 9m24s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Created container frontend-check Normal Started 9m24s (x4 over 16m) kubelet Started container frontend-check Warning BackOff 62s (x15 over 12m) kubelet Back-off restarting failed container frontend-check in pod loadgenerator-66c47bdc74-7j2mg_default(ffb5ce3e-d24a-4461-98c8-2dbd770bd424) ``` 2. `kubectl get configmap` should be `kubectl get configmap -n istio-system` The respective `Output:` section below should be updated accordingly as well. Probably smth like: `kubectl get configmap istio-asm-managed -n istio-system -o yaml`. 3. The instruction "Return to the Workloads and Services & Ingress pages..." doesn't make sense, as there's no instruction to go there preceding it. 4. The instruction "to do one of the following" in #6 of the "Install the Online Boutique application on the GKE cluster" makes no sense, as the only activity proposed is "Look on the Services & Ingress page within the console." 5. Lastly, in "Set Latency Threshold to 1000" unit is missing. 1000 what?
Maciej S. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
sasank k. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Aleksandra G. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Denys F. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Emmanuel S. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Jose E. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Ross S. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
Charuhas K. · Reviewed about 1 year ago
We do not ensure the published reviews originate from consumers who have purchased or used the products. Reviews are not verified by Google.